Many transformational leaders have had their otherwise finest date with history often blighted by one single unpopular decision and Ghana’s own share of the occurrence tick from one regime to another.
Often touted for his generational vision, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah’s draconian Preventive Detention Order which set him up as a repressive democrat, easily erased most of his achievements in the first Republic.
This has often reduced the study of Nkrumah to how he jailed most of his political opponents under the oppressive PDA, consigning his forte, as one of the greatest leaders of the 20th century into the abyss of political history.
Dr. Kofi Abrefa Busia’s rural development programme, although truncated by General Acheampong’s military National Redemption Council (NLC)/Supreme Military Council (SMC) in 1972, the highlight of the Prime Minister’s administration, has been the infamous Aliens Compliance Order where millions of other West African nationals in Ghana were sent packing home on 18th November, 1969.
Ghana suffered the repercussions of the Busia order after some 14 years later. The most hard hit country in the order, Nigeria, retaliated in equal measure, if not more when the Alhaji Shehu Shagari administration deported some three million Ghanaians from our big “brother country”.
The 1983 Ghanaian returnees added to Ghana’s economic woes necessitated by prolonged drought and the obvious decision by developed countries to ostracize Ghana from their league because of the human rights violations of the administration of Rawlings’ Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC).
Gen. Acheampong might have instituted the Operation Feed Your Self novelty, yet many Ghanaians remember him for his unpopular Union Government concept, which, if successful would have made him a life president.
Till today, Jerry Rawlings’ two-prone military/civilian administrations still suffer the stigma of human right violations, which was marked by the in-famous populist refrain “Let the Blood Flow”. Others like Dr. Hilla Limann, John Kufuor, John Mills and John Mahama all have their minuses which are often referenced to, when their regimes come up for critique.
And in all of the instances, people refer to their low points, rather than their pluses and that impact negatively on their political legacies. President Nana Addo’s administration is on course to becoming one of the best in the annals of the country’s political history.
Nana’s leadership lies in his boldness to take decisions where his predecessors devolved to the future; and his one classical policy is the Free Senior High School concept.
The President was aware of the inherent challenges, but taking the decision in itself, many believe was half of the problems solved. This is because it’s only through the implementation process that the challenges evolve for solutions to be found.
So far, Nana’s administration has shown that it’s ready to deal with any negative fall-out of the Free SHS idea. The President doesn’t seem to be bothered by the usual and as expected, the opposition’s taunts of the programme.
Another area that the President is proving that his policies are not only dimensional, but are also dynamic is his tireless attempts to digitize the entire Ghanaian governance structure. It’s a way of catching up with many developed countries and also to deal with the institutional canker of corruption and its related matters.
Perhaps, the one singular policy decision of the President that is likely to decorate and move him into the league of transformational leaders, is the bold decision to confront health care in all of its ramifications in the country. Already, there had been marked improvement in the National Health Insurance policy under the Nana Addo administration.
Almost a week ago, the President launched what he themed “Agenda 111”. It’s a policy where some $36 billion with a seed fund of $100 billion had been secured for the construction of some 111 hospitals for all districts in the country. The project is classified into various categories depending on the character-content and demand of any beneficial area.
The matter of Financial Sector Reforms
However, one area that has found the administration reeling in many fronts is the financial re-structuring that has led to the collapse of many Ghanaian indigenous financial institutions. It’s one decision where its implementation has raised many eye-brows.
In the estimation of some financial analysts, the exercise has the potential of undermining the Akufo Addo legacy after the exit of the President. The fact that the President himself; his Vice and other stakeholders of the administration, speak about the situation at the least opportunity, show how perhaps, their sub-conscience is being tickled by the reform exercise.
Thus the argument has been that the hastily implemented policy has the potential of blighting the otherwise positive history-laden achievements of the President. Over the week-end, the Vice President, Alhaji Dr. Mahmoudu Bawumia opened a new chapter in the never-ending conversation on the financial sector reforms.
He told the NPP majority caucus in Parliament that the “financial sector reform was a painful decision, but we needed to take to safe depositors’ money”. Maybe, the Vice President’s briefing was a means of letting the majority MPs to understand properly the nuances of the exercise or to reiterate to the MPs, the need to stoically, defend government’s slant proposition on the exercise.
Could it also be that government has seen the need to take another look at the exercise? Whichever way it’s viewed, one realizes that the assertion by the Vice President seems to have replaced what had then become a conventional dictate, dominated by the suggestive proposition that the owners of the collapsed financial companies were either rogues or criminals, who stole depositors’ funds.
The rogue imagery has always been at the tip of the justification of the implementing agents of the exercise-the Ministry of Finance (MoF) and the Bank of Ghana (BoG) other than the new dice thrown into the fray by the Vice President.
Where the lost, of depositors’ monies had featured in the thought of agents of the two state financial institutions in the past, it has always been one of the other accusations against the owners of the financial institutions.
Therefore, the real pain of the exercise as the BoG and the MoF made most Ghanaians to believe, was how such owners swindled depositors of their monies. Meanwhile, some of the indigenous Ghanaian institutions had been operating for close to three decades without any problem whatsoever. Others had been operating uninterruptedly for years.
That explains why the clientele base of these Ghanaian financial companies, did not only increase, but also enabled their businesses expand to offices/locations throughout the country. It was simply because, they had the numbers in every part of the country.
It’s been close to four years since these institutions were liquidated, yet most of the people who the Vice President claim, the exercise was carried out on their behalf or to safe them of their deposits still have their funds locked up.
So, how successful has the tears underlying that painful decision to choose the poor depositors over the stigmatized company owners yielded the desired results? It must have indeed been a painful decision, but why still are the ultimate beneficiaries of the exercise still suffering?
In any decision making process, there are always the victors and the vanquished, with the difference lying in the impact the decision may have affected its intended targets.
That explains why some of such painful decisions are taken after thorough consultations and considerations. Many of the company owners still maintain they did no wrong. In, fact, it’s their considered opinion that the so-called lost funds were loaned out to their customers to engage in state projects like roads, markets, sea defence projects etc.
Recently, an Accra High Court ordered the payment of some GHS174 million against a company that had refused to pay a loan it accessed from one of the liquidated companies. This is one classical case which underscore the fact that perhaps, the exercise was done in haste; and strewn in populism to satisfy a prescribed agenda of the implementers.
It also means if the decision had been deferred for a while and allowed for broader consultations the implementing agents would have been satisfied and quashed any form of prejudices that they had against the owners of the Ghanaian financial institutions.
Content created and supplied by: RKeelson (via Opera News )
Opera News is a free to use platform and the views and opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not represent, reflect or express the views of Opera News. Any/all written content and images displayed are provided by the blogger/author, appear herein as submitted by the blogger/author and are unedited by Opera News. Opera News does not consent to nor does it condone the posting of any content that violates the rights (including the copyrights) of any third party, nor content that may malign, inter alia, any religion, ethnic group, organization, gender, company, or individual. Opera News furthermore does not condone the use of our platform for the purposes encouraging/endorsing hate speech, violation of human rights and/or utterances of a defamatory nature. If the content contained herein violates any of your rights, including those of copyright, and/or violates any the above mentioned factors, you are requested to immediately notify us using via the following email address operanews-external(at)opera.com and/or report the article using the available reporting functionality built into our Platform See More