Check Out What Tsatsu Tsikata Told A Seven Panel Supreme Court Justice Which Is Causing Stir Online
Yesterday, the Supreme Court announced that they will give their ruling on whether the Assin North MP can perform his parliamentary role or not. One interesting thing that took place in the Supreme Court was the message top lawyer, Tsatsu Tsikata, delivered to the Seven Panel Judges hearing the case; Justices Jones Dotse, Agnes Dordzie, Nene Amegatcher, Mariama Owusu, Gertrude Torkonoo, Prof. Henrietta Mensah Bonsu Emmanuel Y. Kulendi.

'Your Lordships can decide anyway you want' - Tsatsu Tsikata tells Supreme Court
On Tuesday, lead Counsel for Assin North MP, James Gyakye Quayson, and Tsatsu Tsikata told the Supreme Court Judges they could choose in any case they needed, yet that wouldn't deny his client the option to be heard. This was his reaction when he was told by the seven-part board hearing a case, including his client, to maintain the Court's order.

These Two Judges Among The Panel Disagreed With The Rulings Of The Supreme Court On Quayson Case
Though the Supreme Court has given its ruling on the case of Mr. Gyakye Quayson today 13th April 2022 banning the MP from performing Parliamentary duties until a substantive case filed against him is determined. But among the Panel of judges who sat on the case, two of them think the judgment of the court was not right and therefore disagreed with it but since they were the minority they could not do anything.

Details of the Supreme Court judgement in the matter of Assin North MP
The Supreme Court declared on Wednesday, April 13, that James Gyakye Quayson, the MP for Assin North, can no longer fulfill Parliamentary duties until the outcome of a substantive case filed against him. The court's verdict was read by Justice Jones Dotse. "The application is approved.

‘Your Lordships can decide anyway you want’ – Tsatsu Tsikata tells Supreme Court judges
Lead Counsel for Assin North MP, James Gyakye Quayson, Tsatsu Tsikata on Tuesday told the Supreme Court Judges they can choose in any case they needed, however that wouldn't deny his client, the option to be heard. This was his reaction when he was told by the seven-part board hearing a case including his client, to keep the Court's order.
